Last 10 games
| Defender | Games | Min | eFG% | vs Season | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jabari Smith Jr. | 4 | 27 | 53% | -8.6% | medium |
| Russell Westbrook | 4 | 13 | 63% | +2.5% | medium |
| Naji Marshall | 3 | 12 | 50% | -4.6% | medium |
| Julian Champagnie | 3 | 10 | 83% |
Johnson’s season line sits at 11.8 points, 3.8 rebounds, and 2.3 assists across 44 games, while his last 10 and last 20 scoring averages are both right around 12.2-12.3. His last 5 has spiked to 17.6 points, but that is well above his season mean, so regression risk is real if the usage normalizes. He has been efficient from deep all year at 43.1% on threes, and his recent game log still shows consistent minutes around 30 per game. The safest angle is to lean into his rebounding value and avoid paying for an inflated scoring hot streak.
Toronto’s opponent defense data shows a 111.84 defensive rating with scoring suppression of -0.804 and three suppression of -0.849, which is a modestly tougher environment for offense. No specific defender matchup data is available beyond the listed player pool, so there is no individual matchup edge to lean on.
| Player | Prop | Line | Pick | Confidence | ML | Trend | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cameron Johnson▼ | Points | 11.5 | UNDER | 64%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 50% | 6 | ✓ |
Cameron Johnson▼ | Rebounds | 3.5 | OVER | 71%HIGH | 1/2 | 60% | 5 | ✓ |
Cameron Johnson▼ | Assists | 2.5 | UNDER | 67%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 40% | 2 | ✓ |
Cameron Johnson▼ | 3PM | 1.5 | OVER | 58%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 50% | 0 | ✗ |
Cameron Johnson▼ | STL+BLK | 1.5 | UNDER | 62%MEDIUM | — | 70% | 2 | ✗ |
Cameron Johnson▼ | PRA | 17.5 | UNDER | 60%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 30% | 13 | ✓ |
This is the cleanest numbers-based angle: his season rebound average is 3.8, his last 10 is 4.2, and his home/away splits stay in a tight range around 3.5-4.3. The value_props section also flags strong positive edge on the over at 3.5, making this the best blend of projection and price.
| medium |
| Amen Thompson | 4 | 9 | 58% | +10.8% | medium |
| Defender | Games | Min | PTS | FG% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RJ Barrett | 1 | 4 | 2 | 0% | 0% |
| Ja'Kobe Walter | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% |
| Brandon Ingram | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% |
| Jakob Poeltl | 1 | 1 | 4 | 100% | 100% |
| Immanuel Quickley | 1 | 1 | 6 | 40% | 60% |
His season mean is 11.8 and his last 10 is 12.2, so the market is close to fair despite the last 5 jumping to 17.6. With over picks hitting only 42.8% in the model and the recent spike above season baseline, the under is the more conservative side.
He averages 3.8 rebounds on the season and 4.2 over the last 10, so 3.5 is slightly below his baseline. The value_props data also shows a 12.7% edge on one market and 11.7%+ on several others, which supports the over.
His season average is 2.3 assists and his last 10 is 2.5, but the line is sitting at 2.5 with under juice across several books. That makes the under the cleaner side unless his playmaking role expands.
Johnson averages 1.93 made threes on the season and 2.2 over the last 10, so 1.5 is below his typical output. The edge is not huge, but his volume and 43.1% season three-point shooting support clearing this number.
He averages 1.0 stocks on the season and 1.1 over the last 10, which is below the 1.5 threshold. With only 0.6 steals and 0.4 blocks per game, the combined defensive counting stats are still too modest for an over.
His season PRA is 17.9 based on 11.8 points, 3.8 rebounds, and 2.3 assists, which is nearly identical to the line. Because combo props add variance and the model notes lower hit rates on PRA-type markets, the under is the safer lean.