Last 10 games
| Defender | Games | Min | eFG% | vs Season | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brandon Ingram | 4 | 14 | 59% | +14.2% | medium |
| Khris Middleton | 2 | 11 | 64% | +15.0% | low |
| Bilal Coulibaly | 3 | 8 | 50% | +7.9% | medium |
| Tristan da Silva | 3 | 7 | 20% |
Jarace Walker has been trending heavier lately, with his last 5 games at 14.0 PPG, 7.0 RPG, and 3.6 APG in 31.8 MPG, all above his season marks of 11.3/5.2/2.4. The added opportunity is real with Bennedict Mathurin (18.5 PPG, 31.2 MPG) out, but his game log also shows volatility, including 10 points on 33 minutes and 16 points with 5 turnovers in the last two outings. San Antonio’s team defensive profile is not extreme, but the posted lines and value data still favor caution, especially with his vs opponent sample sitting at just 4.5 PPG and 9.25 MPG across 4 games.
No specific defender matchup data beyond the listed key_defenders, which are too limited to identify a true on-ball matchup. San Antonio’s opponent defense shows a 111.59 defensive rating with pace of 100 and no major scoring-suppression spike, but the head-to-head sample is weak for Walker at 4.5 PPG in 4 games.
| Player | Prop | Line | Pick | Confidence | ML | Trend | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jarace Walker▼ | Points | 14.5 | UNDER | 71%HIGH | 2/2 | 60% | 21 | ✗ |
Jarace Walker▼ | Rebounds | 6.5 | UNDER | 74%HIGH | 2/2 | 50% | 4 | ✓ |
Jarace Walker▼ | Assists | 3.5 | UNDER | 69%MEDIUM | 1/2 | 60% | 4 | ✗ |
Jarace Walker▼ | 3PM | 1.5 | OVER | 55%MEDIUM | 1/2 | 60% | 5 | ✓ |
Jarace Walker▼ | STL+BLK | 1.5 | UNDER | 64%MEDIUM | — | 70% | 1 | ✓ |
Jarace Walker▼ | PRA | 28 | UNDER | 60%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 90% | 29 | ✗ |
Jarace Walker▼ | P+R | 16.5 | UNDER | 63%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 0% | 25 | ✗ |
Jarace Walker▼ | P+A | 14.5 | UNDER | 58%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 30% | 25 | ✗ |
This is the strongest value on the board with a 20.9% edge and 42.16 EV per 100 at Betrivers. Walker’s season rebound average is 5.2, and even his recent 6.4 over the last 10 sits right at the line, making the under the most defensible play.
| medium |
| Ronald Holland II | 3 | 7 | 50% | +7.9% | medium |
| Defender | Games | Min | PTS | FG% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harrison Barnes | 1 | 3 | 3 | 50% | 75% |
| Keldon Johnson | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% |
| Carter Bryant | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% |
| Lindy Waters III | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% |
| Julian Champagnie | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% |
Value data shows the best side is UNDER with a 18.3% edge and our_prob_under of 0.741. His season mean is 11.3 PPG, and even with the recent bump to 14.0 PPG, his recent average is still below a 14.5 line.
The best side is UNDER with a 20.9% edge and strong EV of 42.16 per 100. His season rebound average is 5.2 and his recent 6.4 is only slightly above the line, so this stays a stronger under than over.
The value card points to UNDER with a 14.2% edge and our_prob_under of 0.687. He is averaging 2.4 assists on the season and 3.3 over the last 10, which is better but still not enough to justify the higher line with confidence.
He averages 1.67 made threes on the season and 1.9 over his last 10, so the over is supported by volume. This is still a lower-confidence play because his three-point market is close and the value data does not give a positive edge here.
His season stocks average is 1.17 and last 5 is 1.0, both below a 1.5 threshold. The recent spike in minutes has not translated into consistent multi-category defensive production, so the under is the safer side.
Using his season averages, a projected PRA around 18.9 is well below a line in the high 20s. Combo props carry higher variance, and his recent uptick is not enough to make an over attractive without stronger value support.
His season points-plus-rebounds profile is 16.5 exactly from 11.3 PPG and 5.2 RPG, but recent form is the main reason this is close. Given the book pricing and the general under bias, the under is the cleaner side.
His season points plus assists is 13.7, below a projected 14.5 line, even though recent minutes have pushed his scoring and playmaking upward. This is a volatile combo, so the under is preferred unless the line drops.