Last 10 games
| Defender | Games | Min | eFG% | vs Season | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moussa Diabaté | 3 | 21 | 36% | -10.8% | medium |
| Neemias Queta | 4 | 19 | 62% | +14.3% | medium |
| Jaxson Hayes | 2 | 17 | 50% | +2.8% | low |
| Maxime Raynaud | 2 | 15 | 57% |
Jay Huff is coming in with a season line of 9.4 PPG, 3.8 RPG, and 1.9 BPG, and his recent scoring has been stronger at 10.4 PPG over the last 5 and 12.8 over the last 10. The minutes trend is solid too, with 23.3 MPG over the last 10 versus 20.7 for the season, but his last-5 rebounds have dipped to 2.0, which is below both his season mark and his recent 3.8 rebound average over the last 10. Against San Antonio, the matchup profile is mixed: the opponent pace is 100 with a 111.59 defensive rating, and Huff’s own history vs this opponent is very small at 2.375 PPG and 0.875 RPG in 8 games, so the current role and line value matter more than prior head-to-head. With both Bennedict Mathurin and Johnny Furphy out, his scoring usage has some support, but the best price still looks to be on the rebound under at the available number.
No specific defender matchup data is available beyond the listed key defenders, and the opponent shows a 111.59 defensive rating with 100 pace. Huff’s prior results vs this opponent are low at 2.375 PPG and 0.875 RPG across 8 games, so the matchup data does not strongly support a ceiling outcome.
| Player | Prop | Line | Pick | Confidence | ML | Trend | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jay Huff▼ | Points | 9.5 | UNDER | 58%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 20% | 6 | ✓ |
Jay Huff▼ | Rebounds | 3.5 | UNDER | 67%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 40% | 2 | ✓ |
Jay Huff▼ | Assists | 2.5 | UNDER | 63%MEDIUM | 1/2 | 90% | 4 | ✗ |
Jay Huff▼ | 3PM | 1.5 | OVER | 56%MEDIUM | 1/2 | 70% | 2 | ✓ |
Jay Huff▼ | Blocks | 2.5 | UNDER | 60%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 70% | 1 | ✓ |
Jay Huff▼ | STL+BLK | 3.5 | UNDER | 59%MEDIUM | — | 90% | 1 | ✓ |
Jay Huff▼ | P+R | 13.5 | UNDER | 57%MEDIUM | 1/2 | 40% | 8 | ✓ |
This is the best blend of price, form, and value. The market data shows a 7.8% edge on the under at DraftKings with positive EV, and Huff’s last-5 rebound average is only 2.0 compared to his 3.8 season mean, making 3.5 a favorable threshold to fade.
| low |
| Ariel Hukporti | 3 | 14 | 25% | -22.2% | medium |
| Defender | Games | Min | PTS | FG% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Luke Kornet | 2 | 5 | 2 | 100% | 100% |
| Victor Wembanyama | 1 | 2 | 7 | 38% | 44% |
| Kelly Olynyk | 1 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% |
| Dylan Harper | 2 | 1 | 10 | 80% | 80% |
| Harrison Barnes | 1 | 1 | 3 | 100% | 100% |
His season mean is 9.44 PPG and the book line is 9.5, which makes this essentially a coin flip with slight lean under. Recent scoring is higher, but the over-bias warning and a 5.82 season standard deviation argue for caution rather than chasing the last-10 uptick.
This is the clearest value on the card: the value data shows a 7.8% edge on UNDER with expected value of 17.19 per 100 at DraftKings. He has averaged 3.8 RPG for the season but only 2.0 RPG over the last 5, and his recent role has not translated into steady boards.
He averages just 1.3 APG on the season and 1.0 APG over the last 10, well below 2.5. The high standard deviation relative to his mean keeps confidence capped, but the under is still the more supported side.
Huff averages 1.43 threes per game on the season and 1.9 over the last 10, so the volume is there. Confidence stays moderate because the line sits right near his baseline and three-point production can swing quickly.
He is a strong shot-blocker at 1.9 BPG season-long, but 2.5 is a steep number and the last-5 mark is 1.6. That makes the under the safer side despite his overall blocks upside.
His combined season average is 2.44 stocks and the last 10 sits at 2.3, both below 3.5. Because stocks are high-variance, this is not a high-confidence play, but the under is still the more conservative projection.
His season sums to 13.2 PR using 9.4 points and 3.8 rebounds, which is just under the line, and his recent rebound dip reduces the path to the over. Combo props are volatile, so confidence stays modest.