Last 10 games
| Defender | Games | Min | eFG% | vs Season | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jalen Johnson | 3 | 21 | 50% | +0.3% | medium |
| Miles Bridges | 3 | 18 | 50% | -9.1% | medium |
| Pascal Siakam | 3 | 18 | 59% | +4.1% | medium |
| Scottie Barnes | 3 | 18 | 50% |
Paolo Banchero is trending up, with 25.1 PPG over his last 10 compared to 22.3 for the season, while still logging 34.5 MPG. His recent production is strong, but his season baseline and head-to-head numbers versus this opponent are more moderate at 20.83 PPG, 6.67 RPG, and 4.67 APG across 6 games. The absences of Anthony Black and Franz Wagner support his usage, but the data also shows elevated turnover volume and a fairly volatile scoring profile, which keeps the over cases from getting too aggressive. Against a defense with a 115.14 rating and negative three-point suppression, his best value leans toward the safer under on assists and a more cautious stance on combo props.
The opponent data shows a 115.14 defensive rating, pace of 100, and negative three-point suppression at -0.381. In the provided defender list, there is no specific defender matchup data that clearly changes the projection.
| Player | Prop | Line | Pick | Confidence | ML | Trend | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Paolo Banchero▼ | Points | 24.5 | UNDER | 62%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 40% | 16 | ✓ |
Paolo Banchero▼ | Rebounds | 8.5 | OVER | 55%MEDIUM | 1/2 | 50% | 5 | ✗ |
Paolo Banchero▼ | Assists | 5.5 | UNDER | 68%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 50% | 6 | ✗ |
Paolo Banchero▼ | 3PM | 1.5 | OVER | 53%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 30% | 0 | ✗ |
Paolo Banchero▼ | Blocks | 0.5 | OVER | 52%MEDIUM | — | 30% | 1 | ✓ |
Paolo Banchero▼ | Turnovers | 3 | OVER | 60%MEDIUM | — | 40% | 3 | ✗ |
Paolo Banchero▼ | P+R | 27.5 | UNDER | 58%MEDIUM | 1/2 | 10% | 21 | ✓ |
Paolo Banchero▼ | P+A | 25.5 | UNDER | 64%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 30% | 22 | ✓ |
This is the cleanest edge in the dataset: his season mean is 5.03 APG, his vs-opponent average is 4.67 APG, and the value props show a best-side UNDER with a 9.7% edge at Fanatics. Even with teammate absences boosting usage, the assist line still sits slightly above his core distribution.
| medium |
| Myles Turner | 3 | 14 | 38% | -20.9% | medium |
| Defender | Games | Min | PTS | FG% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Luka Dončić | 2 | 13 | 13 | 29% | 32% |
| LeBron James | 2 | 5 | 6 | 50% | 50% |
| Deandre Ayton | 2 | 3 | 8 | 100% | 100% |
| Rui Hachimura | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% |
| Austin Reaves | 2 | 2 | 3 | 25% | 38% |
His season mean is 22.3 PPG and his vs-opponent average is 20.83 PPG across 6 games, both below 24.5. The last-10 surge to 25.1 is real, but it is not enough to fully override the season baseline and the historical matchup output.
He averages 8.6 RPG on the season and 8.6 RPG over the last 10, with 8.97 RPG away and 8.6 RPG in b2b contexts. This is close to a coin flip, but the recent consistency keeps the over viable at a modest confidence.
Season assists are 5.03 APG and the last 5 is 5.4 APG, both below or near 5.5, while his vs-opponent mark is 4.67 APG across 6 games. The value data also points to the under with a 9.7% edge at this line.
He averages 1.19 made threes on the season and 1.4 over the last 10, which is enough to clear 1.5 at times but not with high certainty. The recent trend supports the over, but variance remains noticeable with a 1.15 season standard deviation.
He averages 0.6 blocks per game for the season and 0.6 over the last 5, so a single block is plausible. This is a low-volume category, so confidence stays moderate.
He has 3.2 turnovers per game in both the last 5 and last 10, so a 3.0 line is playable to the over. The recent logs also show multiple 3+ turnover games, reinforcing that floor.
His season-based projection is close to this range, but the matchup history and season scoring baseline do not strongly support a clear over. Combo props carry more variance, so the under is the more conservative side.
His season averages sum to 27.33, but the opponent history drops to 25.5 combined points and assists only if he stays at his normal level; his assists profile is the weaker piece here. The available value data also favors under on assists, which supports the under angle on this combo.