Last 10 games
| Defender | Games | Min | eFG% | vs Season | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moses Moody | 3 | 14 | 50% | -8.0% | medium |
| Christian Braun | 2 | 12 | 81% | +29.5% | low |
| Keegan Murray | 2 | 11 | 54% | +4.5% | low |
| Jaden McDaniels | 2 | 11 | 67% |
Devin Booker is averaging 25.8 PPG on the season, but his last 5 games have jumped to 34.0 PPG before easing to 30.3 over the last 10, which is still well above his baseline. The value data strongly leans UNDER on his points line, and his season scoring profile is more modest than the recent surge suggests, especially with a 7.44 season standard deviation. He has been productive in this matchup historically at 26.5 PPG across 10 games, but the current projection and book pricing point to a more tempered outcome than his hot stretch.
Booker has 10 games of head-to-head history versus this opponent with 26.5 PPG, 5.0 RPG, and 6.8 APG, so the matchup is familiar but not enough to push an automatic over. His key defender data shows no specific defender matchup data beyond the listed defender pool, so there is no clear one-on-one target to upgrade his projection.
| Player | Prop | Line | Pick | Confidence | ML | Trend | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Devin Booker▼ | Points | 27.5 | UNDER | 86%HIGH | 2/2 | 40% | 14 | ✓ |
Devin Booker▼ | Assists | 5.5 | UNDER | 58%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 60% | 7 | ✗ |
Devin Booker▼ | Rebounds | 4.5 | UNDER | 55%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 60% | 4 | ✓ |
Devin Booker▼ | 3PM | 2.5 | OVER | 55%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 40% | 2 | ✗ |
Devin Booker▼ | Steals | 0.8 | UNDER | 57%MEDIUM | — | 60% | 2 | ✗ |
Devin Booker▼ | Blocks | 0.5 | UNDER | 68%MEDIUM | — | 60% | 1 | ✗ |
Devin Booker▼ | STL+BLK | 1.5 | UNDER | 61%MEDIUM | — | 70% | 3 | ✗ |
Devin Booker▼ | Turnovers | 3.5 | OVER | 59%MEDIUM | — | 50% | 3 | ✗ |
Devin Booker▼ | PRA | 35 | UNDER | 54%MEDIUM | 1/2 | 40% | 25 | ✓ |
This is the strongest value on the board: the season scoring mean is 25.8, the book line is 27.5, and the value data shows a 20.9% edge with 40.8 EV per 100 on the under. His 34.0 PPG last 5 is a clear outlier relative to season form, so regression is the right call.
| low |
| Ousmane Dieng | 2 | 10 | 71% | +11.6% | low |
| Defender | Games | Min | PTS | FG% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ousmane Dieng | 2 | 10 | 10 | 57% | 71% |
| Taurean Prince | 2 | 5 | 5 | 50% | 63% |
| Kyle Kuzma | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0% |
| Ryan Rollins | 2 | 2 | 3 | 33% | 33% |
| Pete Nance | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% |
Season scoring is 25.8 PPG versus a 27.5 line, and the value data shows the UNDER as the best side with a 20.9% edge and 40.8 EV per 100. His last 5 at 34.0 is well above season pace, so regression risk is high.
He averages 5.9 APG on the season, but the recent mean is 4.8 and the under is the preferred side in the pricing data, though the edge is small. His assist profile is volatile with a 2.72 season standard deviation, so confidence stays moderate.
Booker averages 3.9 RPG on the season and 4.1 over the last 10, both below 4.5. The market data does not provide meaningful edge for the over, so the safer lean is under.
He averages 1.83 threes on the season and 2.5 over the last 10, with recent volume at 2.5 3PA makes the line reachable. The value props also show a small positive edge on the over, but not enough for high confidence.
Booker’s season average is exactly 0.8 SPG, but recent form is only 0.6 over the last 10 and 0.2 over the last 5. With limited disruption production and modest defensive event rates, the under is slightly safer.
He averages 0.3 BPG on the season and 0.4 over the last 10, still below a 0.5 line. The profile does not support consistent block volume.
His season stocks average is 1.13 and recent mean is 1.0, both under 1.5. Because stocks props are volatile, staying under the threshold is the more conservative play.
He is averaging 3.2 turnovers per game over the last 20 and 3.4 over the last 10, with multiple recent games at 4+ turnovers. That usage level makes 3.5 reachable despite the volatility.
Using season averages, Booker projects to about 35.5 PRA, but the combo prop caution applies and recent assist/rebound output is softer than the points spike implies. The edge is thin enough that the under is the more conservative stance.