Last 10 games
| Defender | Games | Min | eFG% | vs Season | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tyrese Maxey | 3 | 17 | 36% | -9.3% | medium |
| CJ McCollum | 5 | 13 | 75% | +16.8% | medium |
| Jamal Murray | 2 | 12 | 117% | +54.3% | low |
| Payton Pritchard | 2 | 9 | 50% |
Terance Mann’s season line is modest at 7.3 PPG, 3.2 RPG, and 3.1 APG across 58 games, and his recent form has dipped to 5.4 PPG over the last 5 with only 21.8 MPG. The matchup is workable on paper, especially with the opponent allowing a 120.99 defensive rating and missing Domantas Sabonis, but Mann’s own usage has not shown consistent spike potential lately. The best angle is price-based rather than production-based: the available points market at 7.5 is below his season mean and supported by the value data. Combo props are less attractive because his recent assist and rebound output has been uneven and the variance is high.
No specific defender matchup data was provided. The opponent context is mixed: Sacramento has a 120.99 defensive rating and is missing Domantas Sabonis, but without specific defender data the matchup boost is best treated as moderate rather than strong.
| Player | Prop | Line | Pick | Confidence | ML | Trend | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Terance Mann▼ | Points | 7.5 | OVER | 63%MEDIUM | 1/2 | 40% | 5 | ✗ |
Terance Mann▼ | Rebounds | 3.5 | UNDER | 58%MEDIUM | 1/2 | 70% | 3 | ✓ |
Terance Mann▼ | Assists | 3.5 | UNDER | 60%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 80% | 2 | ✓ |
Terance Mann▼ | 3PM | 0.5 | OVER | 52%MEDIUM | — | 50% | 1 | ✓ |
Terance Mann▼ | Blocks | 0.5 | UNDER | 72%HIGH | — | 80% | 0 | ✓ |
Terance Mann▼ | STL+BLK | 1 | UNDER | 78%HIGH | — | 100% | 0 | ✓ |
Terance Mann▼ | Turnovers | 1.5 | OVER | 55%MEDIUM | — | 20% | 0 | ✗ |
Terance Mann▼ | P+A | 10.5 | UNDER | 66%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 70% | 7 | ✓ |
This is the clearest value angle because the market line is 7.5 while his season average is 7.3 PPG, and the value props show a 12.2% edge with positive EV. Recent form is below average at 5.4 PPG over the last 5, so it is not a high-confidence play, but the pricing still makes the OVER the best bet.
| low |
| Brandon Ingram | 3 | 8 | 29% | -17.1% | medium |
| Defender | Games | Min | PTS | FG% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Devin Carter | 2 | 2 | 5 | 100% | 125% |
| Doug McDermott | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% |
| Precious Achiuwa | 1 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% |
| DaQuan Jeffries | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% |
| Daeqwon Plowden | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% |
His season average is 7.3 PPG and the FanDuel line is 7.5, but the value data shows a 12.2% edge to the OVER with an expected value of 24.0 per 100. Recent form is softer at 5.4 PPG over the last 5, so confidence stays moderate rather than aggressive.
He averages 3.2 RPG on the season and 2.7 RPG over the last 10, while recent minutes have fallen to 20.4 MPG. The line sits slightly above his season mean, making the UNDER the safer side in a lower-minute environment.
His season mean is 3.12 APG, but the last 5 is only 2.0 and the last 10 is 2.2, showing clear recent softness. With the line at 3.5 and no strong recent assist trend, the UNDER is favored.
He averages 0.86 threes per game on the season and 0.8 over the last 5, so he still has a reasonable path to 1+ made three. The recent volume is low, so this is only a thin lean.
He averages just 0.2 BPG on the season and 0.2 over the last 10, far below a 0.5 line. Even with a favorable opponent context, the block rate is too low for an OVER.
His season stocks average is 0.86 and recent stock production is only 0.2 over the last 5 and 0.2 over the last 10. That recent decline makes the UNDER the stronger call.
He is at 1.3 turnovers per game on the season and 1.4 over the last 5, with several recent games at 1-3 turnovers. This is close enough to the line that the OVER gets a slight lean.
His season points-plus-assists profile is roughly 10.4 using 7.3 PPG and 3.1 APG, while recent form is weaker at 8.6 using 5.4 PPG and 2.0 APG. With the line at 10.5, the UNDER is the more conservative side.