Last 10 games
| Defender | Games | Min | eFG% | vs Season | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CJ McCollum | 6 | 11 | 55% | +10.1% | medium |
| Tyrese Maxey | 2 | 9 | 35% | -14.4% | low |
| Luka Dončić | 1 | 7 | 44% | -6.9% | low |
| Pascal Siakam | 4 | 7 | 38% |
Baylor Scheierman’s season line is modest at 4.8 PPG, 3.5 RPG, and 1.4 APG, but his recent role has been much bigger, with 27.2 MPG over the last 10 and 26.6 MPG over the last 5. That usage boost has lifted his recent production to 7.3 PPG, 6.1 RPG, and 2.6 APG, though his overall trend is still listed as down and his last game was only 2 points. The matchup is not a pure scoring boost, but Minnesota’s opponent scoring suppression is -0.126 and three suppression is -0.193, so efficiency could be muted even with extra minutes. Anthony Edwards being out helps the game environment, but there is no specific defender matchup data to lean on for a direct edge.
Minnesota’s opponent profile shows a 114.77 defensive rating, pace of 100, scoring suppression of -0.126, and three suppression of -0.193. There is no specific defender matchup data, so this is more of a pace-and-efficiency environment read than a direct one-on-one edge.
| Player | Prop | Line | Pick | Confidence | ML | Trend | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baylor Scheierman▼ | Points | 4.5 | OVER | 56%MEDIUM | 1/2 | 70% | 5 | ✓ |
Baylor Scheierman▼ | Rebounds | 3.5 | OVER | 61%MEDIUM | 1/2 | 90% | 4 | ✓ |
Baylor Scheierman▼ | Assists | 1.5 | OVER | 57%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 80% | 2 | ✓ |
Baylor Scheierman▼ | 3PM | 1 | OVER | 54%MEDIUM | 1/2 | 50% | 1 | ✗ |
Baylor Scheierman▼ | STL+BLK | 1.5 | UNDER | 63%MEDIUM | — | 100% | 0 | ✓ |
Baylor Scheierman▼ | Turnovers | 1 | OVER | 58%MEDIUM | — | 20% | 0 | ✗ |
Baylor Scheierman▼ | PRA | 10 | OVER | 52%MEDIUM | 1/2 | 80% | 11 | ✓ |
Baylor Scheierman▼ | P+A | 5.5 | UNDER | 60%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 20% | 7 | ✗ |
The rebound profile is the cleanest part of the projection because his season average is 3.49 RPG but the last 10 has jumped to 6.1 RPG and the last 5 to 6.6 RPG. With 27.2 MPG recently, 3.5 is a reachable number without needing a hot shooting night.
| medium |
| Cade Cunningham | 4 | 6 | 54% | +1.8% | medium |
| Defender | Games | Min | PTS | FG% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Naz Reid | 2 | 5 | 2 | 20% | 20% |
| Julius Randle | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0% | 0% |
| Bones Hyland | 1 | 1 | 5 | 50% | 63% |
| Anthony Edwards | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% |
| Jaden McDaniels | 2 | 1 | 2 | 25% | 25% |
His season mean is 4.83, and the recent minutes jump to 27.2 MPG has pushed his last-10 scoring to 7.3 PPG. Still, the last game at 2 points and Minnesota’s scoring suppression make this only a modest lean.
He is averaging 3.49 RPG for the season but 6.1 RPG over the last 10 and 6.6 RPG over the last 5, supported by 27.2 MPG recently. With that role, 3.5 is a reachable number if he keeps the extra run.
His season average is 1.37 APG, but he has averaged 2.6 APG over the last 10 and 3.0 APG over the last 5. The elevated minutes make 1.5 attainable, though the season baseline keeps confidence moderate.
Scheierman’s season average is 1.08 threes made per game, and he is at 1.7 over the last 10. Minnesota’s three suppression is -0.193, so the over is playable but not strong.
He averages 0.65 stocks for the season and 0.6 over the last 10, which is well below 1.5. Even with the minutes bump, the combined defensive events profile is too low for the over.
His recent topg is 0.9 and he has had multiple games with 1-3 turnovers while handling more minutes. A 1.0 line is right in the range where the added usage can push him over.
His recent production is 7.3 PPG, 6.1 RPG, and 2.6 APG, which clearly exceeds his season pace. Because combo props carry more variance, this is a cautious over only if the minutes stay elevated.
He is at 4.8 PPG plus 1.4 APG for the season, and that combination is still more aligned with a mid-5s line than a higher one. Recent usage helps, but the scoring role remains limited enough to prefer the under on an inflated number.