Last 10 games
| Defender | Games | Min | eFG% | vs Season | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Desmond Bane | 3 | 21 | 56% | +5.8% | medium |
| Payton Pritchard | 4 | 19 | 38% | -6.7% | medium |
| Jalen Brunson | 3 | 17 | 63% | +14.1% | medium |
| Jaylen Brown | 3 | 15 | 53% |
Andrew Nembhard has been consistent overall, with season averages of 17.2 PPG, 7.2 APG, and 2.8 RPG, but his recent production has cooled slightly in playing time at 26.9 MPG over the last 10. His last-5 scoring is 17.4 PPG and assists are 6.6 APG, which is close to season norm rather than a strong surge, so this is more stability than breakout territory. The matchup context is not especially friendly: Orlando carries a 114.14 defensive rating with a 100 pace and negative three-point suppression, which can cap efficiency and volume. With multiple teammate and opponent absences in the mix, his role should remain relevant, but the market is pricing him close to his season baseline.
No specific defender matchup data. Orlando’s defense profile shows a 114.14 defensive rating, 100 pace, and negative three-point suppression, which suggests a slower, more efficiency-sensitive environment for Nembhard’s scoring and perimeter volume.
| Player | Prop | Line | Pick | Confidence | ML | Trend | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Andrew Nembhard▼ | Points | 16.5 | UNDER | 59%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 40% | 13 | ✓ |
Andrew Nembhard▼ | Assists | 6.5 | OVER | 56%MEDIUM | 1/2 | 60% | 14 | ✓ |
Andrew Nembhard▼ | Rebounds | 2.5 | OVER | 54%MEDIUM | 1/2 | 30% | 7 | ✓ |
Andrew Nembhard▼ | 3PM | 1.5 | OVER | 58%MEDIUM | 1/2 | 60% | 1 | ✗ |
Andrew Nembhard▼ | STL+BLK | 1.5 | UNDER | 63%MEDIUM | — | 80% | 0 | ✓ |
Andrew Nembhard▼ | Turnovers | 2.5 | OVER | 57%MEDIUM | — | 50% | 2 | ✗ |
Andrew Nembhard▼ | P+A | 23.5 | OVER | 52%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 60% | 27 | ✓ |
This is the cleanest value spot because his season average is 1.89 made threes and his home split is 2.07, both above the line. The value feed also shows positive edge on the over at 1.5, making it preferable to the more efficient but less attractive points market.
| medium |
| Josh Giddey | 2 | 15 | 79% | +27.2% | low |
| Defender | Games | Min | PTS | FG% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Desmond Bane | 3 | 21 | 19 | 50% | 56% |
| Anthony Black | 2 | 6 | 11 | 67% | 75% |
| Tristan da Silva | 3 | 3 | 6 | 75% | 75% |
| Paolo Banchero | 3 | 3 | 15 | 57% | 64% |
| Jevon Carter | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% |
His season mean is 17.2 PPG, but his vs-opponent scoring is only 10.875 PPG across 8 games, well below this number. Orlando’s 114.14 defensive rating and 100 pace add a modest drag to scoring volume.
He averages 7.2 APG for the season and 7.11 APG at home, with last-5 at 6.6 APG despite reduced minutes. The line is below his season mean, though variance keeps confidence moderate.
Nembhard’s season mean is 2.8 RPG and he averages 3.0 RPG at home. The recent 2.0 RPG mark is lower, but the line sits beneath his season baseline.
He averages 1.89 threes per game for the season and 2.07 at home, with recent play at 1.7. Value data also shows positive edge on the over at this line.
His season stocks average is 1.08 and recent is 1.1, both below 1.5. He has just 0.9 SPG and 0.1 BPG on the season, so this is a clear pass to the under.
He averages 2.8 turnovers over his last 20 and 3.2 away from home, both above a 2.5-type projection. The recent 2.4 mark is still close enough to support an over lean.
His season scoring-plus-assists profile is 24.4 combined from 17.2 PPG and 7.2 APG, which sits just above this line. Because combo props are higher variance, confidence stays muted.