Last 10 games
| Defender | Games | Min | eFG% | vs Season | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Williams | 4 | 18 | 45% | -9.8% | medium |
| Alperen Sengun | 3 | 17 | 42% | -13.2% | medium |
| Harrison Barnes | 4 | 16 | 44% | -11.6% | medium |
| Bam Adebayo | 2 | 14 | 59% |
Chet Holmgren’s season line sits at 17.2 points and 9.0 rebounds in 29.3 MPG, but his recent scoring has eased to 16.8 over the last 5 and 16.1 over the last 20, reinforcing a slight downtrend. The strongest current angle is on the glass: his home split is 12.4 rebounds per game, and the value data shows multiple +EV rebounding overs, including a 6.5% edge at 7.5 rebounds. Philadelphia is missing Joel Embiid and Paul George, which matters for the overall frontcourt environment, while no specific defender matchup data is available beyond the listed key defenders. Given the depressed assist volume and only modest recent scoring, rebounds are the clearest prop to target.
No specific defender matchup data is available beyond the listed key defenders, so there is no reliable one-on-one assignment edge to project. The opponent context does show Joel Embiid out, which helps overall interior conditions, but the clearest actionable matchup note remains the absence-driven environment rather than a named defender.
| Player | Prop | Line | Pick | Confidence | ML | Trend | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chet Holmgren▼ | Points | 16.5 | UNDER | 58%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 50% | 17 | ✗ |
Chet Holmgren▼ | Rebounds | 7.5 | OVER | 70%HIGH | 1/2 | 90% | 9 | ✓ |
Chet Holmgren▼ | Assists | 1.5 | UNDER | 69%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 50% | 4 | ✗ |
Chet Holmgren▼ | 3PM | 1.5 | UNDER | 63%MEDIUM | — | 90% | 3 | ✗ |
Chet Holmgren▼ | Blocks | 1.5 | OVER | 56%MEDIUM | 1/2 | 50% | 5 | ✓ |
Chet Holmgren▼ | STL+BLK | 2.5 | UNDER | 61%MEDIUM | — | 60% | 5 | ✗ |
Chet Holmgren▼ | P+R | 24.5 | UNDER | 57%MEDIUM | 1/2 | 40% | 26 | ✗ |
This is the cleanest edge in the dataset: season average 8.98 rebounds, home average 12.4 rebounds, and a 6.5% edge at multiple books on the over. The line is simply too low versus his home rebounding profile, and the provided value data supports attacking it.
| low |
| Ivica Zubac | 2 | 12 | 33% | -22.0% | low |
| Defender | Games | Min | PTS | FG% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adem Bona | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0% | 0% |
| Dominick Barlow | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0% | 0% |
| Andre Drummond | 2 | 6 | 5 | 40% | 50% |
| Tyrese Maxey | 1 | 1 | 5 | 33% | 50% |
| Quentin Grimes | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 0% |
His season mean is 17.25, but the recent trend is down at 16.5 over the last 10 and 16.1 over the last 20. With the market sitting at 16.5 and the under showing the better value profile in the provided data, the under is the safer lean.
His season rebound average is 8.98 and his home split jumps to 12.4 RPG, which is a strong indicator for this matchup. The value data shows a 5.6% edge at DraftKings and 6.5% edge at other books on the over, making this the best-supported play.
He averages only 1.67 assists for the season and just 0.8 over the last 5, so the recent distribution is even lighter than normal. Despite teammate absences, his assist role has not shown enough stability to justify an over at this number.
He averages 1.21 threes per game on the season, but recent output is only 1.0 over the last 5 and his last 10 remains just 1.0. With modest volume and no clear edge in the provided value data, the under is preferred.
He averages 1.9 blocks on the season and 1.6 over the last 20, so 1.5 is below his typical rim-protection level. The recent last-5 dip to 1.0 keeps confidence in check, but the season baseline still supports the over.
His season stocks average is 2.41, while the last 5 is 1.8 and the last 10 is 2.3, both below a strong over threshold. Combo-style volatility is high here, so the conservative side is the under.
His season points plus rebounds baseline is 26.2, but the recent scoring softness and the common combo-prop volatility make this less attractive than the rebounding straight line. This is a close call, so the under gets the nod on caution.