Last 10 games
| Defender | Games | Min | eFG% | vs Season | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ryan Rollins | 2 | 6 | 56% | +10.6% | low |
| James Harden | 2 | 6 | 79% | +26.4% | low |
| DeMar DeRozan | 2 | 5 | 0% | -45.0% | low |
| Brandon Ingram | 2 | 5 | 75% |
Justin Edwards’ recent production has jumped with his minutes, as his last 5 games show 18.2 PPG, 2.2 RPG, and 2.4 APG versus a season line of 6.3 PPG, 1.7 RPG, and 1.4 APG. That said, his season baseline is still low, and the last-10 output (13.1 PPG) is already well above his full-season mean, so some regression risk remains. Philadelphia has multiple teammate absences, including Joel Embiid and Paul George, which supports a larger role, but his prop landscape is still driven more by opportunity than stable high-usage creation. The safest angles are the ones that align with his established volume and the current sportsbook prices, especially threes and points unders at inflated lines.
No specific defender matchup data is available from the provided key_defenders list beyond the named Thunder players and their limited minutes. The opponent context shows Oklahoma City allowing a 107.54 defensive rating with a pace of 100 and a 0.786 three suppression mark, which is not an obvious boost for his scoring ceiling.
| Player | Prop | Line | Pick | Confidence | ML | Trend | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Justin Edwards▼ | Points | 11.5 | UNDER | 62%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 50% | 8 | ✓ |
Justin Edwards▼ | Rebounds | 2.5 | UNDER | 68%MEDIUM | 1/2 | 70% | 1 | ✓ |
Justin Edwards▼ | Assists | 1.5 | OVER | 60%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 80% | 2 | ✓ |
Justin Edwards▼ | 3PM | 1.5 | UNDER | 74%HIGH | 2/2 | 50% | 2 | ✗ |
Justin Edwards▼ | Blocks | 0.5 | UNDER | 64%MEDIUM | — | 80% | 0 | ✓ |
Justin Edwards▼ | STL+BLK | 1.5 | OVER | 61%MEDIUM | — | 70% | 1 | ✗ |
Justin Edwards▼ | PRA | 17.5 | UNDER | 58%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 40% | 11 | ✓ |
This is the clearest value on the board: the value_props data shows the under has a 10.1% to 10.8% edge depending on book, with projected under probability at 59.6%. His season average of 1.09 threes per game is below the line, and the recent spike to 2.0 in the last 10 is not enough to ignore the stronger season baseline.
| low |
| Donovan Mitchell | 3 | 4 | 125% | +55.0% | medium |
| Defender | Games | Min | PTS | FG% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jalen Williams | 2 | 4 | 6 | 43% | 43% |
| Aaron Wiggins | 2 | 3 | 3 | 50% | 75% |
| Cason Wallace | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% |
| Isaiah Hartenstein | 2 | 1 | 2 | 100% | 100% |
| Chet Holmgren | 2 | 1 | 6 | 100% | 125% |
His season mean is only 6.3 PPG, and the last-10 mark of 13.1 PPG is already elevated versus that baseline. The recent surge is real, but the edge is thin and the higher recent scoring makes regression a concern.
He averages just 1.7 RPG on the season and 1.9-2.0 in the home/away splits, which sits below this line. Recent games have been volatile, and the season profile supports the under.
His season average is 1.4 APG, but the last-5 and last-10 windows are 2.4 and 2.8 APG, showing the role is expanded right now. The market line of 1.5 is modest relative to that recent usage.
He averages 1.09 threes per game on the season, and the value data shows a 0.101-0.108 edge on the under at 1.5. Even with a recent uptick, the under remains the cleanest +EV angle.
His season block average is only 0.2, so clearing 0.5 requires an outlier game. The recent 0.6 in the last 5 is better, but still not enough to make the over the preferred side.
He averages 1.09 stocks on the season and 2.1 in the last 10, with 2.4 in the last 5. That recent defensive activity is strong enough to justify a cautious over lean.
Combo props carry extra variance, and his season-based production is far below this number. The recent surge helps, but the combination of low season means and compounding volatility keeps the under safer.