Last 10 games
| Defender | Games | Min | eFG% | vs Season | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jabari Smith Jr. | 4 | 14 | 63% | +6.5% | medium |
| Donte DiVincenzo | 3 | 14 | 40% | -13.5% | medium |
| Jake LaRavia | 4 | 13 | 50% | -3.5% | medium |
| Desmond Bane | 2 | 11 | 54% |
Julian Champagnie has been stable overall, with season averages of 11.1 points, 5.8 rebounds, and 1.5 assists across 27.7 MPG, while his last 10 and last 5 scoring marks sit close to that range at 11.2 and 11.4. The matchup is not especially inviting for offense: Miami carries a 117.07 defensive rating and his prior history vs this opponent is muted at 4.75 PPG in 22.25 MPG across 4 games. With his season scoring mean already below the common 10.5 line and the value data showing an under lean on points, the strongest angle is fading his scoring volume rather than chasing a ceiling game.
No specific defender matchup data is available beyond the listed key defenders, so there is no specific defender matchup data to target directly. Miami’s team defense profile is solid enough to keep this from being a breakout scoring spot, and his 4-game history vs this opponent has been well below his season scoring level.
| Player | Prop | Line | Pick | Confidence | ML | Trend | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Julian Champagnie▼ | Points | 10.5 | UNDER | 78%HIGH | 1/2 | 50% | 3 | ✓ |
Julian Champagnie▼ | Rebounds | 5.5 | UNDER | 56%MEDIUM | 1/2 | 50% | 5 | ✓ |
Julian Champagnie▼ | Assists | 1.5 | OVER | 52%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 40% | 0 | ✗ |
Julian Champagnie▼ | 3PM | 2.5 | UNDER | 63%MEDIUM | 1/2 | 50% | 0 | ✓ |
Julian Champagnie▼ | Steals | 0.5 | OVER | 54%MEDIUM | — | 40% | 0 | ✗ |
Julian Champagnie▼ | Blocks | 0.5 | UNDER | 58%MEDIUM | — | 60% | 0 | ✓ |
Julian Champagnie▼ | STL+BLK | 1.5 | UNDER | 60%MEDIUM | — | 60% | 0 | ✓ |
Julian Champagnie▼ | Turnovers | 2 | UNDER | 66%MEDIUM | — | 90% | 0 | ✓ |
Julian Champagnie▼ | P+R | 15.5 | UNDER | 62%MEDIUM | 1/2 | 40% | 8 | ✓ |
Julian Champagnie▼ | P+A | 12.5 | UNDER | 64%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 50% | 3 | ✓ |
This is the cleanest read on the board: his season average is 11.1 points, but his results vs this opponent are only 4.75 PPG across 4 games and the value data repeatedly points to the UNDER at 10.5. The market has already priced his role fairly, and there is no strong injury-driven usage boost in the provided data.
| low |
| Trey Murphy III | 3 | 11 | 100% | +44.0% | medium |
| Defender | Games | Min | PTS | FG% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pelle Larsson | 2 | 7 | 2 | 50% | 50% |
| Simone Fontecchio | 1 | 3 | 6 | 67% | 100% |
| Andrew Wiggins | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0% |
| Davion Mitchell | 2 | 1 | 3 | 100% | 150% |
| Jaime Jaquez Jr. | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% |
Season mean is 11.1, but his head-to-head vs this opponent is only 4.75 PPG over 4 games and the value data shows a 10.5 line with an UNDER edge at multiple books. This is a better spot to trust the lower-scoring history than the slightly hotter last-5 form.
He averages 5.8 rebounds on the season and 5.5 over the last 10, so this is close to fair market pricing. With no clear edge in the value data and away/home splits not showing a strong over case, the under is the slightly safer side.
He’s at 1.5 assists for the season and 1.6 over the last 5, so the market is right on his average. This is a low-confidence over only because his recent play is holding steady and the line is modest.
He averages 2.39 made threes per game on the season and 2.3 over the last 5, both below 2.5. That makes the under the more logical side, especially since the recent sample does not show a real spike above the line.
He averages 0.8 steals on the season and 1.0 over the last 5, which supports clearing 0.5 in a typical minutes role. This is still a volatile category, so confidence stays modest.
His season average is 0.4 blocks and the last 10 sits at 0.5, so this is a borderline line. Given the low mean and volatility, the under is the safer lean.
He averages 1.23 stocks on the season and 1.2 over the last 5, both below 1.5. Even with some recent defensive activity, the combo number is still a step above his typical output.
His season turnover rate is only 0.8 and the last 10 is 1.1, well short of 2.0. Unless usage changes sharply, this line is too high.
His season points plus rebounds profile comes to 16.9, but the market line is elevated and the under is supported by his subdued vs-opponent scoring history. Combo props carry more variance, so confidence stays moderate.
He averages 12.6 points plus assists on the season, which is essentially on the number, but his opponent history and the conservative points outlook push this slightly under. This is a thin edge, not a strong play.