Last 10 games
| Defender | Games | Min | eFG% | vs Season | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| De'Aaron Fox | 3 | 11 | 33% | -7.7% | medium |
| Anthony Edwards | 2 | 11 | 64% | +16.1% | low |
| Cade Cunningham | 2 | 9 | 33% | -7.7% | low |
| Shai Gilgeous-Alexander | 3 | 8 | 54% |
Jordan Goodwin is producing 8.7 PPG, 4.7 RPG, and 2.2 APG on the season across 22.2 MPG, with his recent form trending down to 5.8 PPG over the last 5. His last 10 is steadier at 8.3 PPG, 4.2 RPG, and 1.8 APG, which lines up closely with his season baseline rather than the weaker short-term dip. This matchup comes with a Spurs defense that has a 111.76 defensive rating and a 100 pace, so the environment is not especially fast, and his history vs this opponent is solid at 9.9 PPG, 6.1 RPG, and 3.0 APG in 9 games. With his scoring variance still fairly high and his recent minutes only around 19.6 MPG over the last 5, the safer angle is leaning toward lower-end volume props rather than points aggression.
No specific defender matchup data beyond the listed Spurs players; the available opponent context shows a 111.76 defensive rating and 100 pace. His prior results vs San Antonio are respectable, but the current environment does not point to a major pace boost.
| Player | Prop | Line | Pick | Confidence | ML | Trend | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jordan Goodwin▼ | Points | 8.5 | UNDER | 64%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 70% | 5 | ✓ |
Jordan Goodwin▼ | Rebounds | 5.5 | UNDER | 67%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 80% | 8 | ✗ |
Jordan Goodwin▼ | Assists | 2.5 | UNDER | 58%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 70% | 0 | ✓ |
Jordan Goodwin▼ | 3PM | 1.5 | UNDER | 56%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 50% | 1 | ✓ |
Jordan Goodwin▼ | Steals | 1.5 | UNDER | 62%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 60% | 3 | ✗ |
Jordan Goodwin▼ | Blocks | 0.5 | UNDER | 81%HIGH | — | 80% | 0 | ✓ |
Jordan Goodwin▼ | STL+BLK | 1.5 | UNDER | 61%MEDIUM | — | 50% | 3 | ✗ |
Jordan Goodwin▼ | Turnovers | 0.5 | UNDER | 74%HIGH | — | 70% | 0 | ✓ |
Jordan Goodwin▼ | PRA | 16.5 | UNDER | 57%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 80% | 13 | ✓ |
This is the cleanest edge in the data because his season average is just 0.2 blocks and he has no meaningful recent shot-block volume. The under aligns with both the season baseline and the last 10 trend, making it the most stable option.
| medium |
| Stephen Curry | 3 | 8 | 45% | -11.0% | medium |
| Defender | Games | Min | PTS | FG% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| De'Aaron Fox | 3 | 11 | 8 | 33% | 33% |
| Devin Vassell | 4 | 6 | 5 | 50% | 63% |
| Victor Wembanyama | 3 | 5 | 7 | 50% | 58% |
| Julian Champagnie | 4 | 4 | 12 | 67% | 100% |
| Dylan Harper | 3 | 4 | 4 | 67% | 67% |
His season mean is 8.66, but the last 5 is only 5.8 and his trend is down. That makes 8.5 a fair number, and the recent scoring dip plus 22.2 season MPG suggest limited margin for an over.
He averages 4.71 rebounds on the season and 4.4 over the last 5, both below 5.5. Even though he has a strong historical line vs this opponent at 6.11 RPG, the season baseline is still the more reliable anchor.
Season assists are 2.19 and last 5 is 1.8, so the under has a small but real edge. The 1.5 season standard deviation also signals meaningful variance, keeping confidence moderate.
He averages 1.51 threes seasonally, but just 0.8 over the last 5 and 1.4 over the last 10. That recent drop makes the over less appealing at a 1.5 line.
The season average is 1.4 steals, but a 1.5 line is still aggressive given his last 10 at 1.1 and last 5 at 1.0. The over is too dependent on event-driven production.
He averages only 0.2 blocks per game, so the under is the clear side. There is not enough shot-block volume for a 0.5 line to project an over.
His season stocks average is 1.64, but the last 5 is down to 1.2 and the last 10 is 1.3. Because stocks are volatile, the season edge is not strong enough to push confidence higher.
He is only at 0.3 turnovers over the last 10 and 0.4 over the last 5, so low turnover volume is the norm. A projected 0.5 line leans under based on recent ball security.
His season blend of 8.7 points, 4.7 rebounds, and 2.2 assists adds to 15.6, which sits below 16.5. Combo props carry extra variance, so the under is preferable but not ultra-strong.