Last 10 games
| Defender | Games | Min | eFG% | vs Season | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alperen Sengun | 4 | 14 | 79% | +29.2% | medium |
| Dwight Powell | 3 | 13 | 80% | +30.6% | medium |
| Julius Randle | 4 | 11 | 50% | +0.6% | medium |
| Nic Claxton | 2 | 10 | 29% |
Kyle Filipowski is producing above his season baseline lately, with 13.6 PPG, 7.8 RPG, and 4.0 APG over his last 5 compared to season marks of 10.7, 7.0, and 2.4. That said, his recent scoring is running well above season average, so regression risk is real even with the extra usage from Utah’s absences. The matchup is softened by Philadelphia missing Joel Embiid and Paul George, but the available data still points to a more balanced projection than the recent hot stretch. With his season-to-recent gap and a handful of under-friendly value signals, the safest angle is to fade the inflated scoring line.
Philadelphia is missing Joel Embiid and Paul George, which improves the environment for Utah scorers and frontcourt production. There is no specific defender matchup data beyond the listed key defenders, so the safest read is that the absence context helps, but not enough to fully justify an aggressive over on inflated lines.
| Player | Prop | Line | Pick | Confidence | ML | Trend | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kyle Filipowski▼ | Points | 15.5 | UNDER | 82%HIGH | 2/2 | 60% | 12 | ✓ |
Kyle Filipowski▼ | Rebounds | 7.5 | UNDER | 57%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 40% | 6 | ✓ |
Kyle Filipowski▼ | Assists | 3.5 | UNDER | 66%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 40% | 4 | ✗ |
Kyle Filipowski▼ | 3PM | 1.5 | UNDER | 71%HIGH | 2/2 | 80% | 1 | ✓ |
Kyle Filipowski▼ | Steals | 1.5 | UNDER | 72%HIGH | 2/2 | 70% | 1 | ✓ |
Kyle Filipowski▼ | Blocks | 0.5 | OVER | 55%MEDIUM | — | 70% | 1 | ✓ |
Kyle Filipowski▼ | STL+BLK | 1.5 | OVER | 56%MEDIUM | — | 70% | 2 | ✓ |
Kyle Filipowski▼ | Turnovers | 2 | OVER | 60%MEDIUM | — | 30% | 1 | ✗ |
Kyle Filipowski▼ | PRA | 30 | UNDER | 63%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 60% | 22 | ✓ |
This is the clearest value spot in the data, with multiple books showing the under as the best side and a 27.7% edge at 15.5. Filipowski’s 10.66 season PPG sits well below the line, and his 13.9 last-10 scoring is already elevated enough to invite regression.
| low |
| Nikola Vučević | 2 | 9 | 72% | +19.4% | low |
| Defender | Games | Min | PTS | FG% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adem Bona | 2 | 8 | 9 | 80% | 80% |
| Dominick Barlow | 2 | 2 | 2 | 50% | 50% |
| Andre Drummond | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% |
| Quentin Grimes | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 0% |
| Jabari Walker | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 0% |
His season mean is 10.66 PPG, while recent production is 13.9 PPG, which is elevated enough to create regression risk. The value data also shows a strong under lean at 15.5 with a 27.7% edge and 49.78 EV per 100 on the under.
He averages 6.97 RPG for the season and 8.9 over the last 10, but the rebound line is only slightly above his season norm. The edge data is weak here, so this is more of a cautious lean than a strong play.
Season assists are 2.4 APG, and even with recent growth to 3.9 over the last 10, the line sits above his season baseline. The value board also favors the under at 3.5.
He averages 0.9 made threes per game on the season and 1.1 over the last 10, which is still below this line. The under is supported by the data despite his recent uptick.
He averages 1.0 SPG on the season, but 1.5 is a demanding line for a low-volume defensive stat. The recent trend is positive, but the distribution is volatile enough to prefer the under.
He averages 0.5 BPG on the season and 0.6 over the last 5, so this line is aligned with his baseline production. This is a thin edge, but the raw rate supports an over lean.
His season stocks average is 1.48 and recent marks are 2.1 over the last 10, which clears the volume threshold. Because of the stat volatility, confidence stays modest.
He has averaged 2.0 turnovers over the last 10 and 2.5 over the last 20, with recent games showing several 3+ turnover outings. The role increase has come with higher turnover risk.
His season PRA is 20.1 and his recent form is better, but combo props carry extra variance. Given the inflated scoring/rebounding run, the under is the more conservative side.