Last 10 games
| Defender | Games | Min | eFG% | vs Season | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reed Sheppard | 3 | 7 | 69% | +3.1% | medium |
| Jeremiah Fears | 6 | 6 | 42% | -8.4% | medium |
| Julian Reese | 2 | 6 | 83% | +36.4% | low |
| Nikola Jokić | 2 | 6 | 80% |
John Konchar’s recent role has ticked up, with his last 5 averaging 24.0 MPG compared to 17.6 MPG for the season, and that has lifted his all-around production. Still, his season scoring baseline is only 3.6 PPG, and the value market is clearly leaning to the under on points and assists despite the expanded run. Home splits are better than away, but his recent scoring is volatile, so the safer angle is to fade the inflated short-term spike and trust the season profile more heavily.
No specific defender matchup data for this player beyond the listed key defenders, so there is no specific defender matchup data. The opponent is allowing a 124.36 defensive rating with a 100 pace, but the opponent also has multiple listed absences, which can create some volatility in role and efficiency.
| Player | Prop | Line | Pick | Confidence | ML | Trend | Evolution | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
John Konchar▼ | Points | 7.5 | UNDER | 88%HIGH | 1/2 | 80% | 3.5→7.5 | 8 | ✗ |
John Konchar▼ | Rebounds | 5.5 | UNDER | 76%HIGH | 2/2 | 90% | FLIP | 14 | ✗ |
John Konchar▼ | Assists | 2.5 | UNDER | 82%HIGH | 2/2 | 70% | 1.5→2.5 | 5 | ✗ |
John Konchar▼ | 3PM | 0.5 | UNDER | 68%MEDIUM | — | 70% | 0 | ✓ | |
John Konchar▼ | Steals | 1.5 | UNDER | 70%HIGH | 2/2 | 60% | FLIP | 1 | ✓ |
John Konchar▼ | Blocks | 0.5 | OVER | 73%HIGH | — | 70% | 3 | ✓ | |
John Konchar▼ | STL+BLK | 2.5 | OVER | 71%HIGH | — | 30% | 1.5→2.5 | 4 | ✓ |
John Konchar▼ | Turnovers | 1 | OVER | 64%MEDIUM | — | 30% | FLIP | 0 | ✗ |
John Konchar▼ | R+A | 8 | UNDER | 66%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 80% | — | 19 | ✗ |
This is the cleanest edge in the data: season scoring is 3.57 PPG, last 10 is 4.8, and the value props show the UNDER as the best side across books at 7.5. Even with a recent minutes bump to 24.0 MPG and a 7.0 PPG last-5 spike, that run is well above his season baseline and looks prone to regression.
| low |
| Malik Monk | 2 | 5 | 0% | -46.9% | low |
| Defender | Games | Min | PTS | FG% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julian Reese | 2 | 6 | 11 | 83% | 83% |
| Leaky Black | 2 | 4 | 5 | 67% | 83% |
| Anthony Gill | 2 | 3 | 4 | 100% | 100% |
| Bilal Coulibaly | 2 | 3 | 6 | 60% | 60% |
| Will Riley | 2 | 3 | 12 | 80% | 100% |
Season mean is 3.57 PPG versus 7.0 in the last 5, and the value data shows the UNDER as the best side at this line. His scoring variance is high, but the season baseline and market pricing both point to under 7.5.
He averages 3.46 RPG for the season and 4.2 in the last 10, still below this number. The recent bump is not enough to justify an OVER given the season profile and modest rebound mean.
His season mean is 1.52 APG and the recent mean is 1.6, both well below 2.5. Even with teammate absences, the data still supports a lower-probability assist ceiling than the line implies.
He averages just 0.43 threes per game on the season, with only 0.6 in the last 5. The line is close, but season volume and efficiency are weak enough to favor the under.
He averages 1.3 steals on the season, but the standard deviation is large and the recent window is only 1.0. For a volatile defensive stat, the safer lean is under 1.5.
He averages 0.6 blocks per game on the season and 0.6 over the last 5, which is enough to support an OVER at a 0.5 line. His defensive event rate is more stable than his scoring.
He averages 1.89 stocks on the season and 2.7 over the last 10, with strong recent defensive production. The combo is volatile, but his recent blocks plus steals have cleared this range often enough to lean over.
His season turnover average is 0.9, but the last 10 sit at 0.9 as well and recent minutes have risen to 24.0 MPG. This is a low-confidence over only because the role increase can create a few more miscues.
Using season averages, his rebounds plus assists project to 4.96, well short of 8.0. Combo props are higher variance, so the under is still the more conservative side.