Last 10 games
| Defender | Games | Min | eFG% | vs Season | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anfernee Simons | 3 | 13 | 71% | +4.9% | medium |
| Duncan Robinson | 4 | 10 | 75% | +4.9% | medium |
| Payton Pritchard | 4 | 10 | 25% | -20.1% | medium |
| Nickeil Alexander-Walker | 3 | 10 | 69% |
Quentin Grimes has been in strong recent form, averaging 24.6 PPG over his last 5 and 21.9 over his last 10, well above his 14.1 season average. That said, his season baseline is much lower than the hot streak, and his head-to-head history vs Chicago is only 8.0 PPG across 11 games. With 30.4 MPG on the season and 34.3 MPG in the last 10, volume is solid, but the current point line range is already pricing in some of the recent spike.
The opponent defense data shows a 120.34 defensive rating, pace of 100, and scoring suppression of 1.106. Chicago-specific defender data is limited to the provided key defenders, and there is no specific defender matchup data beyond those split samples.
| Player | Prop | Line | Pick | Confidence | ML | Trend | Evolution | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quentin Grimes▼ | Points | 15.5 | UNDER | 58%MEDIUM | 1/2 | 20% | FLIP | 13 | ✓ |
Quentin Grimes▼ | Rebounds | 3.5 | OVER | 56%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 60% | 2.5→3.5 | 6 | ✓ |
Quentin Grimes▼ | Assists | 3.5 | UNDER | 66%MEDIUM | 1/2 | 60% | FLIP | 5 | ✗ |
Quentin Grimes▼ | 3PM | 1.5 | UNDER | 54%MEDIUM | 1/2 | 70% | FLIP | 1 | ✓ |
Quentin Grimes▼ | Steals | 0.5 | OVER | 52%MEDIUM | — | 60% | 3 | ✓ | |
Quentin Grimes▼ | Blocks | 0.5 | UNDER | 78%HIGH | — | 80% | 3 | ✗ | |
Quentin Grimes▼ | STL+BLK | 1.5 | UNDER | 61%MEDIUM | — | 70% | 6 | ✗ | |
Quentin Grimes▼ | Turnovers | 2 | OVER | 55%MEDIUM | — | 40% | 1 | ✗ | |
Quentin Grimes▼ | PRA | 23.5 | UNDER | 53%MEDIUM | 1/2 | 30% | — | 24 | ✗ |
This is the cleanest value spot in the data: his season mean is 3.44 APG, the last-20 is down to 2.9 APG, and the value props list the under as +EV with a 13.3% edge. It also avoids relying on the unsustainably hot scoring stretch, which is already well above his season baseline.
| medium |
| Dyson Daniels | 4 | 10 | 68% | +18.5% | medium |
| Defender | Games | Min | PTS | FG% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Josh Giddey | 3 | 6 | 14 | 75% | 88% |
| Kevin Huerter | 2 | 5 | 7 | 50% | 58% |
| Matas Buzelis | 3 | 5 | 5 | 40% | 50% |
| Tre Jones | 3 | 3 | 4 | 50% | 50% |
| Coby White | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0% | 0% |
His 14.1 season scoring average is below this line, and his vs-opponent mark is just 8.0 PPG in 11 games. The last-5 spike to 24.6 is strong, but that is well above season level and a regression spot.
He averages 3.7 RPG for the season and 4.5 over the last 10, with 4.6 RPG in the last 5. The line is aligned with his role, and recent minutes have been up at 34.3 MPG.
His season average is 3.4 APG, but the last 20 drops to 2.9 APG and the home split is only 1.7 APG. The provided value data also flags the under as +EV with a 13.3% edge.
He is at 1.78 made threes per game on the season but only 1.3 over the last 10 and 1.3 over the last 5. The market is not giving much room, so the under is the more cautious side.
He averages 0.9 SPG on the season and 0.8 over the last 5, so clearing 0.5 is reasonable. Confidence stays modest because steals are volatile.
He averages only 0.4 BPG on the season and 0.2 in the last 5 and last 10. That makes 0.5 a tough threshold to project over.
His season stocks average is 1.25 and recent marks are 1.0 to 1.1, both below a 1.5 threshold. This is a higher-variance combo, so the under is safer.
He is at 2.0 turnovers over the last 5 and 2.3 over the last 10, above his 1.9 last-20 mark. With expanded recent minutes and usage, 2-plus turnovers is live.
His season baseline of 21.2 PRA is much closer to this range than the recent surge, but combo props carry extra variance. Given the over-bias warning, the under is the more conservative side.