Last 10 games
| Defender | Games | Min | eFG% | vs Season | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mouhamed Gueye | 3 | 5 | 0% | -53.3% | medium |
| Jordan Miller | 2 | 5 | 14% | -39.0% | low |
| Rasheer Fleming | 2 | 5 | 150% | +46.7% | low |
| Luguentz Dort | 2 | 5 | 50% |
Pete Nance is trending up, with his last 5 averages rising to 5.8 PPG, 4.0 RPG, and 1.4 APG while his minutes climbed to 20.8 MPG from a season mark of 12.5 MPG. The absences of Giannis Antetokounmpo and Kevin Porter Jr. should keep rotation usage elevated, but his season-long production still sits at just 4.7 points, 2.3 rebounds, and 0.7 assists. The matchup is not especially intimidating on paper, but his prior results vs this opponent were only 1.5 PPG and 0.5 RPG across 2 games, so the profile still leans conservative. Given the over-bias warning and his high variance, the best angles are the unders on the main scoring/rebounding lines unless the book posts very low numbers.
No specific defender matchup data. Portland's opponent profile shows a 117.08 defensive rating with a 0.373 scoring suppression and 0.639 three suppression, so there is some resistance to easy production even without a named defender edge.
| Player | Prop | Line | Pick | Confidence | ML | Trend | Actual | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pete Nance▼ | Points | 4.5 | OVER | 54%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 50% | 6 | ✓ |
Pete Nance▼ | Rebounds | 2.5 | OVER | 56%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 50% | 4 | ✓ |
Pete Nance▼ | Assists | 0.5 | OVER | 58%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 60% | 2 | ✓ |
Pete Nance▼ | 3PM | 0.5 | OVER | 53%MEDIUM | 2/2 | 60% | 1 | ✓ |
Pete Nance▼ | Blocks | 0.5 | OVER | 51%MEDIUM | — | 30% | 1 | ✓ |
Pete Nance▼ | STL+BLK | 1.5 | UNDER | 62%MEDIUM | — | 80% | 1 | ✓ |
Pete Nance▼ | Turnovers | 0.5 | UNDER | 57%MEDIUM | — | 80% | 1 | ✗ |
Pete Nance▼ | PRA | 7.5 | UNDER | 60%MEDIUM | 1/2 | 50% | 12 | ✗ |
This line is far above his season average of 0.47 stocks and still well above his recent mean of 0.6. With only moderate defensive event production and high variance, the under is the most stable angle in the prop set.
| low |
| John Collins | 1 | 5 | 50% | -3.3% | low |
| Defender | Games | Min | PTS | FG% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hansen Yang | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 0% |
| Blake Wesley | 1 | 0 | 3 | 33% | 33% |
| Robert Williams III | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 0% |
| Caleb Love | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 0% |
| Rayan Rupert | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 0% |
His season mean is 4.66 points and his last 5 are 5.8, with minutes up to 20.8 MPG recently. The role boost from teammate absences supports a modest over, but the 4.8-point season standard deviation keeps confidence low.
He is averaging 2.26 rebounds for the season and 4.0 over the last 5, with 3.1 over the last 10. The recent minute increase makes this a reasonable over, though rebound variance remains high.
His season mean is 0.74 assists and recent mean is 1.1, so a 0.5 line is below his average output. The assist profile is still volatile, but the elevated role keeps the over playable.
He averages 0.92 made threes per game for the season and 0.8 over the last 5, with 1.05 at home. The volume is not huge, but the low line gives the over a slight edge.
His season mean is 0.2 blocks, but he has averaged 0.8 blocks over the last 5 and 0.4 over the last 10. This is a pure form-based play and should be treated cautiously because of the small sample.
His season stocks average is only 0.47, and even the recent mean is 0.6. A 1.5 line is well above his usual production, making the under the safer side.
He averages just 0.3 turnovers over the last 10 and 0.5 over the last 20, with multiple recent zero-turnover games. If he stays in a lower-usage role, the under is favored.
His season PRA sits at 7.7 using the provided averages, but that number is driven by low-volume production and his recent form is only modestly higher. Because combo props are high-variance, the under is slightly preferable.